far_field
Forum Replies Created
It is the result of moving to HPV testing as the primary screen rather than looking at cells first. The HPV test is better at ruling out risk, so a negative gives reassurance for longer.
Intervals lengthened because the test got better, not because the service got smaller.
Most people who acquire these types never develop a visible wart. Whether you get one depends heavily on your own immune response, not on some measure of how infected you are.
So the likeliest explanation is that he has encountered the same virus and simply never produced a lesion.
It is what happens when the bacteria get into the bloodstream from the original site and settle elsewhere. The classic picture is fever, a small number of skin lesions, inflammation of tendons, and joint pain that moves around.
Less commonly it affects the heart valves or the lining of the brain, which is the reason it gets taken seriously.
The organism does survive somewhat better in moisture than some others, and there are case reports of transmission through shared damp objects. It remains rare.
Chlorinated pools and hot tubs are not a realistic route. Overwhelmingly this is sexually transmitted.
They are different species, but several of the same active ingredients are used for both. That said, formulations differ and some head lice products are specifically not intended for use on genital skin.
Check with a pharmacist before using what you have rather than assuming interchangeability.
The grading systems describe how much of the thickness of the surface layer shows abnormal cells, and they translate roughly into low grade and high grade categories.
Low grade changes very often resolve on their own. High grade changes are the ones usually treated, because they are the ones with meaningful risk of progression if left.
The injection has the strongest evidence and the longest track record, and it is the recommended first line treatment everywhere.
The alternative has been used for a long time in people who cannot have penicillin and does have supporting evidence, but it is a smaller and less rigorous body of work.
It is deliberate. Blood testing people without symptoms produces a lot of results that are hard to interpret, including borderline positives that turn out to be wrong, and it rarely changes what anyone does.
Several guidelines specifically advise against it as routine screening for that reason.
Throat infections also matter beyond you. They are thought to play a role in resistance developing, because the throat is where this organism meets other bacteria and swaps genetic material.
Resistance does exist and it is described, but it is uncommon relative to how often people present like this. The far more frequent explanations are reinfection from an untreated partner and incomplete treatment.
So the order is usually: confirm partners were treated, confirm the course was completed, then investigate resistance.
Recommendations for people with HIV often differ from the general population, including wider age eligibility and in some places a different number of doses.
The reasoning is that HPV related disease, including anal and cervical precancer, is more common with HIV, so prevention matters more.
You cannot waste an appointment by going, so start there. But to answer it: risk varies enormously by activity rather than being one flat category.
Unprotected vaginal or anal sex carries the broadest risk. Oral sex carries real but different risk, mainly for gonorrhoea, syphilis and herpes. Skin to skin contact without penetration can transmit herpes and HPV. Hands carry very little.
Yes, and it is a firm no. Products for hands and feet are formulated for thick skin and are not suitable for genital skin. They can cause significant chemical burns and scarring there.
The packaging usually says this explicitly, and it is not a legal disclaimer, it is the actual reason.
Therapeutic vaccines aimed at existing infection and at precancerous lesions are an active research area, and some have looked promising in trials. Nothing is in routine use.