northwindow
Forum Replies Created
Prioritisation usually puts pregnant patients and infants at the front of the queue for the injection, because that is the situation where the alternatives are not acceptable. If you are not in that group, tablets are the reasonable allocation.
You are waiting to see whether your immune system clears it, which is what happens in the large majority of cases.
The virus being present with normal cells means nothing has changed yet. The repeat test asks whether it has gone or whether it is persisting, and persistence is the thing that matters.
The risk that gets talked about comes from infection that sits untreated for a long time and ascends, causing inflammation and scarring. Treated infection is a different situation.
A single episode found and treated is not something most clinicians would expect to affect fertility.
The usual route is exactly yours: people who are already suppressed on tablets switching across. That is the situation the injectable regimen was studied in.
The main things to weigh are that it ties you to appointments on a schedule, that there is a window around each injection you have to keep, and that some people get injection site reactions.
Your friend is closer to the evidence than the leaflet is. The supposed disulfiram like reaction with metronidazole has been looked at repeatedly and the evidence for it is thin. A small controlled study found no reaction and no change in the enzyme the theory depends on.
The warning stayed in the labelling anyway, which is why you were told it firmly.
That said, if you are struggling, or it is not settling within a day, or you have hives, swelling or difficulty breathing, that is different and needs to be seen now. Those would suggest an allergic reaction rather than this.
Ask specifically for the index value in writing and ask what confirmatory testing is available to you. Availability varies a lot by country and by lab, and it is not always offered unless you raise it.
For anyone finding this later with a long standing diagnosis: recurrent herpes in pregnancy is a much lower risk situation, and suppressive treatment towards the end is commonly considered. Different conversation, much less alarming.
Either way the rule is the same. Tell the people delivering your baby.
Do not put the standard lotion near your eyes. Treatment at the eyelashes and eyebrows is handled differently, usually with a thick ophthalmic ointment applied repeatedly over about ten days, essentially to suffocate them, or with physical removal.
Oral treatment is sometimes used for this situation. Either way it is a clinic conversation rather than a pharmacy purchase.
The guidance changed. In the CDC 2021 update doxycycline for a week became the recommended regimen for chlamydia, with the single dose azithromycin moved to alternative.
The main driver was rectal infection, where the week long course performs noticeably better. Since rectal infection is often present without anyone knowing, treating everyone with the more effective option was the simpler call.
There is no approved screening test for oral HPV, which is frustrating but also means there is nothing you are failing to ask for.
HPV is associated with a majority of cancers in that part of the throat, and most oral HPV infections clear on their own without ever causing anything. The absence of a test is because no screening programme has been shown to help, not because nobody thought of it.
Go back rather than retreating on assumption. Persistent odour after trich treatment is often bacterial vaginosis, which is extremely common alongside it and which sometimes needs its own treatment or recurs.
Retreating for trich would not address it.
Not a coincidence. Warts commonly grow or multiply during pregnancy, and they often shrink again afterwards.
Tell your maternity team. Some treatments used routinely are not used in pregnancy, so this needs to be managed by people who know you are pregnant rather than self treated with something from before.
Get seen today, urgently, and say the word syphilis to whoever you see. Visual symptoms in someone with syphilis need same day assessment because ocular involvement can occur at any stage and is sight threatening if left.
This is not a wait for the next appointment situation and not a forum question.
Go back. Persistent symptoms after treatment need assessment rather than patience, and there are several possibilities worth separating.
It could be a second untreated infection, it could be inflammation that takes longer to settle than the infection itself, or it could be something that is not an infection at all.
It can still make sense, because the vaccine covers several types and you’re unlikely to have been exposed to all of them. It won’t treat what you already have, which is the part that gets misunderstood.
Whether it’s recommended and whether it’s funded for your age varies a lot by country, so that’s a question for your own clinic rather than for us.
Ask that question in writing if you can, or write down the answer in the room. I left an identical appointment reassured and then couldn’t reconstruct why by the evening.
Serofast is the term for exactly what you are describing: a low titre that stays reactive and stops falling after treatment, rather than going fully negative.
It is common enough to have its own name. A meaningful proportion of people treated for early syphilis do not achieve the expected fourfold drop within twelve months, and low starting titres are less likely to fall dramatically in the first place.
Do not let it put you off the follow up appointment if they booked one, especially if yours was a throat infection. The sore arm is temporary, the follow up swab is the bit that confirms it has gone.
The timescale is the part that should lower your heart rate. Progression from persistent infection to anything serious is typically measured in the better part of a decade, not months, and you are in a screening programme designed to catch changes long before that.
Normal cells with persistent HPV means the surveillance is doing exactly what it exists to do.
Ask two things before you leave: when your follow up test is, and whether this has any implications if you plan a pregnancy. Both are standard questions with straightforward answers, and both are much harder to chase up later.
Two separate benefits to separate. It will not clear what you already have, and the evidence on whether it prevents recurrence of existing warts is genuinely unsettled rather than positive.
What it can do is protect you against the types you have not yet encountered, including the high risk ones, and that is usually the stronger argument.
Population data shows large falls in the types the vaccine covers and in high grade cervical disease in vaccinated cohorts. It worked. It just did not promise what people heard.
Practical bits that caught me out: check what name your clinic shows up as in a bank statement if you pay for anything, and set your phone so message previews do not appear on the lock screen. The lock screen was the one I nearly missed.
Possibly, and it is worth assuming so rather than hoping. Reinfection between partners during the treatment window is the single most common reason this comes back.
Ring the clinic, explain the timeline honestly, and ask whether you both need retreating and when to retest.