west_pier
Forum Replies Created
It is also worth knowing that plenty of things in that area are not herpes: folliculitis, friction, ingrown hairs, other infections entirely. A clinician looking at it settles far more than a mirror does.
Worth knowing what they were approved for. The indications are for uncomplicated urogenital infection, and one of them is framed around people with limited or no alternatives. That is narrower than every case of gonorrhoea everywhere.
The treatments overlap but are not identical, and the household advice differs a lot. Scabies usually means treating everyone in the household at the same time, which is not the case for pubic lice.
So it is worth getting the right answer rather than treating for both and hoping.
If your work genuinely makes it impossible, ring the clinic rather than abandoning treatment. There are other options and they would much rather adjust than have you stop halfway.
If the barrier is being examined, ask whether a photograph or a video appointment is possible. Some services do this and it gets you an answer without the room.
What is useful for him is vaccination if he is eligible, and being aware of anything persistent that needs looking at. That is genuinely the whole list.
The ninety day figure you have seen applies to rapid tests and self tests, not to lab tests. They have a longer window because fingerprick blood and oral fluid lag behind plasma.
So the right number depends on which test you had, which is why the internet appears to contradict itself.
Definitely do not shave over an active outbreak. Beyond the pain, you are dragging a blade across lesions and then across unaffected skin, which is the one mechanism that genuinely could spread it locally.
If he will not be treated, he can at least be examined. A clinician finding nothing is a reasonable outcome. A partner declaring himself clear on the basis of feeling fine is not.
Many screening programmes have moved to HPV testing first, with cells only examined if HPV is found. That means this incidental finding turns up less often than it used to.
Ask specifically for it to be considered rather than mentioning it in passing. It is the kind of symptom that gets attributed to something else in a busy appointment if it is not stated clearly.
The standard advice is to wait a week after treatment, and crucially a week after your partner’s treatment as well, not after yours.
So on your dates the clock effectively runs from Friday, not Tuesday.
A large trial looked specifically at adding the vaccine to wart treatment and the recurrence benefit was not convincing. Worth knowing before somebody sells it to you on that basis.
The service is designed to be anonymous and the staff take that seriously. What they send says someone you have been in contact with has tested positive for something, please come and get tested. It does not name you.
Whether the person can guess is a separate matter, and honestly if you have had one partner in the relevant window they probably can. That is not the clinic failing, it is arithmetic again.
A normal screening result does not rule out a symptom needing investigation. Screening is for people without symptoms, and there is a different pathway for people with them.
If you do disclose and get treated badly, that is worth reporting rather than absorbing. Confidentiality and non discrimination are professional obligations, not favours.
Bed bugs are what people usually mean when they blame a hotel, and those are a completely different creature with a completely different response. Worth ruling out if the bites are on parts of you that are not the pubic area.
Broadly yes. It is caused by particular strains of the same organism, and it behaves differently: more invasive, often affecting the rectum and lymph nodes, and it needs a longer course of treatment than ordinary chlamydia.
Because of the longer course, it matters whether it is identified rather than treated as standard chlamydia.
It is one of the reasons treating promptly matters. The risk of it comes from infection left running, not from the treatment.
Vulval skin conditions are underdiagnosed and frequently mistaken for recurrent infection for years. If nobody has examined the skin properly as skin, that is worth asking for.
It is also slow, like the immune type cream, and it is not available everywhere. Ask what your service actually stocks rather than arriving with a request they cannot fill.
A fourfold rise is the threshold usually used as significant, because small movements between tests are within normal variation. Ask what the actual numbers were rather than reading the direction alone.
Two practical things that are time sensitive. If the last sex was within the last few days, post exposure prophylaxis may be relevant and that window is measured in hours. Say that first.
After that, testing, and then a repeat later because of the window period.
Genital HSV-1 also tends to recur much less often than HSV-2 does, so the outlook is generally better than the general herpes information you have probably been reading.
Vaccination is the other half. It is expected to reduce these cancers over time, which is a large part of why programmes became gender neutral.